how to assign lysimer kuhlemeyer boundary conditions in GID

A forum dedicated to users with questions regarding soil materials and elements.

forum currently locked

Moderator: Moderators

Locked
sreedharrao144
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:08 am
Location: L&T EDRC KOLKATA

how to assign lysimer kuhlemeyer boundary conditions in GID

Post by sreedharrao144 » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:25 am

Sir,
I m working in soil structure interaction problem.I modeled bridge in opensees.I modeled soil domain in GID.But I could not assign L-K boundary condition.I created BAS File even though it is not taking.I could not get boundary conditions in calculation file in GID.Please help me in this regard.If possible kindly provide any example for BAS File. Your reply is very important for my thesis progress.

mcganncr
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 4:22 pm
Location: University of Canterbury

Re: how to assign lysimer kuhlemeyer boundary conditions in

Post by mcganncr » Fri Feb 25, 2011 1:01 pm

I created an example a while back that showed how to use GiD to set up an analysis of a 2D slope. I incorporated a Lysmer-Kuhlemeyer dashpot boundary condition there. In that example, I provided the problemType (.bas file) that I used, and I explain how to apply the various conditions in GiD. This should give you some ideas/hints on how to do it for your model.

http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index ... Generation

Chris McGann
University of Washington

evgin
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:18 pm
Location: UCLA

Re: how to assign lysimer kuhlemeyer boundary conditions in

Post by evgin » Sun Dec 18, 2011 11:40 pm

Hi Chris,

Regarding '' Effective Stress Site Response Analysis of a Layered Soil Column'' that you have posted the code online , I have tired to create my own code to generate the node numbers and coordinates. Part of my code for -ndm 2 -ndf 2 is as follows. However, I dont know why I am getting an error. Would you please take a look at it. Thanks.


#---SOIL GEOMETRY
# thicknesses of soil profile (m)

set soilThick 30.0

# number of soil layers

set numLayers 3

# layer thicknesses

set layerThick(3) 2.0

set layerThick(2) 8.0

set layerThick(1) 20.0

# depth of water table

set waterTable 2.0

# define layer boundaries

set layerBound(1) $layerThick(1)

set sum $layerBound(1)

for {set i 2} {$i<=$numLayers} {incr i 1} {

set sum [expr $sum+$layerThick($i)]

set layerBound($i) $sum

}

#---MESH GEOMETRY

# number of elements in horizontal direction

set nElemX 1

# number of nodes in horizontal direction

set nNodeX [expr 2*$nElemX+1]

# horizontal element size (m)

set sElemX 2.0

# number of elements in vertical direction for each layer

set nElemY(3) 4

set nElemY(2) 16

set nElemY(1) 40

# total number of elements in vertical direction

set nElemT 60

# vertical element size in each layer

for {set i 1} {$i <=$numLayers} {incr i 1} {

set sElemY($i) [expr $layerThick($i)/$nElemY($i)]

puts "size: $sElemY($i)"
}

# number of nodes in vertical direction

set nNodeY [expr 2*$nElemT+1]

# total number of nodes

set nNodeT [expr $nNodeX*$nNodeY]

################# creating interiror nodes #################

model BasicBuilder -ndm 2 -ndf 2

set x1coord [expr $sElemX/2]

set x2coord $sElemX

set k 1

set nodelist {}


set lowerBound 0

for {set j 1} {$j<= $nNodeY} {incr j 1} {

if {[expr ($j-1)*$sElemY($k)/2]<=$layerBound($k) && [expr ($j-1)*$sElemY($k)/2]> $lowerBound} {

set ycoord [expr ($j-1)*$sElemY($k)/2]

lappend nodelist $ycoord

return $nodelist


} else {

set k [expr $k+1]

if {$k>3} {

set k 3

}

}

set lowerBound $layerBound($k)

}

for {set i 2} {$i <= $nNodeY} {incr i 3} {


set k 2

set ycoor [lindex $nodelist [expr $i-$k]]

node $i $x1coord $ycoor

set k [expr $k+2]

}

for {set i 1} {$i <= [expr $nNodeY-$nElemT]} {incr i 6} {


set k 0

set ycoor [lindex $nodelist [expr $i-$k]]

node $i 0 $ycoor

node [expr $i+2] $x2coord $ycoor


set k [expr $k+4]

}

Manason14
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:38 am
Contact:

Re:

Post by Manason14 » Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:43 am

Your summits and the specifics are overwhelming and it is mostly accommodating and unadventurous meant for me.

Locked