Advantages of OpenSees compared to other softwars?

A forum dedicated to feature requests and the future direction of OpenSees, i.e. what would you like, what do you need, what should we explore

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
cctvcctv
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 9:45 pm
Location: UC Irvine-Utah State University

Advantages of OpenSees compared to other softwars?

Post by cctvcctv » Fri May 06, 2005 11:48 pm

we have so many general and specific FEA softwares in practical engineering and research, such as Ansys, Sap2000, Adina, Abacus, etc.

Why need opensees? and what are the advances and uniques of OpenSees?

Thanks!

hachem
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 4:29 pm
Location: Degenkolb

Re: Advantages of OpenSees compared to other softwars?

Post by hachem » Mon May 09, 2005 9:34 am

There are advantages and disadvantages.

Advantages: Open source, Open Architecture, FREE!, Specialized element and material models (like fiber beam-column element), parallel (yet to become usable), easy to add your element and material models (even solvers etc...), C++ Object Oriented design, Reliability analysis capabilities (udner development)

Disadvantages: under development, questionable robustness for professional applications, no general-purpose UI, no spectral analysis capabilities, no design check capabilities (but you can add your own!)

Others may want to add and/or correct me.

silvia
Posts: 3909
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 7:44 am
Location: Degenkolb Engineers
Contact:

Post by silvia » Mon May 09, 2005 9:37 am

okey, hachem,
i'll write a script for "no spectral analysis capabilities" so you can take that one off the bottom list and move it up.
actually, you probably already have such a script you might want to share, don't you?
:)
Silvia Mazzoni, PhD
Structural Consultant
Degenkolb Engineers
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA. 94104

pejman_opensees
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 10:40 am
Location: k.n.toosi University

one disadvantage

Post by pejman_opensees » Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:40 am

There are couple of advantages but mentioning them is a complement but as a disadvantage is it does not have a corotational nonlinear beam column element and that is exactly what I am going to add to this software. isnt it a good idea?
Pejman

silvia
Posts: 3909
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 7:44 am
Location: Degenkolb Engineers
Contact:

Post by silvia » Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:06 pm

it does, you use the corotational transformation on the beam element.
Silvia Mazzoni, PhD
Structural Consultant
Degenkolb Engineers
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA. 94104

Post Reply