bug to be corrected in FEM_ObjectBrokerAllClasses

For developers writing C++, Fortran, Java, code who have questions or comments to make.

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
thomas.ulrich
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 2:12 am
Location: Orléans

bug to be corrected in FEM_ObjectBrokerAllClasses

Post by thomas.ulrich » Tue Apr 09, 2013 1:09 am

When saving restoring with an uniaxial ModIMKPeakOriented, I've got the following issue:

FEM_ObjectBrokerAllClasses::getNewUniaxialMaterial - - no UniaxialMaterial type exists for class tag 67
[compute-0-8:24843] *** Process received signal ***
[compute-0-8:24843] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)


To solve the problem, please add the following lines in FEM_ObjectBrokerAllClasses.cpp:

#include <ModIMKPeakOriented.h>
case MAT_TAG_ModIMKPeakOriented:
return new ModIMKPeakOriented();


Thomas.

fmk
Site Admin
Posts: 5883
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: UC Berkeley
Contact:

Re: bug to be corrected in FEM_ObjectBrokerAllClasses

Post by fmk » Wed Apr 17, 2013 9:40 am

I have made the modifications and checked them in.

marcod
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 5:56 pm
Location: University of Padua

Re: bug to be corrected in FEM_ObjectBrokerAllClasses

Post by marcod » Fri Oct 25, 2013 6:43 pm

Hello, I'm new to the forum.
For the first time I have used Database Command (saving and restoring of the model), but I get this error message:

FEM_ObjectBrokerAllClasses::getNewUniaxialMaterial - - no UniaxialMaterial type exists for class tag 46

I have used in the model: "uniaxialMaterial ElasticPP" and "uniaxialMaterial ElasticMultiLinear".
Is there a solution to the problem? For me it would be important... Thanks in advance.

fmk
Site Admin
Posts: 5883
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: UC Berkeley
Contact:

Re: bug to be corrected in FEM_ObjectBrokerAllClasses

Post by fmk » Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:08 am

i have added to the source code .. svn revision 5578

marcod
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 5:56 pm
Location: University of Padua

Re: bug to be corrected in FEM_ObjectBrokerAllClasses

Post by marcod » Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:43 am

Thank you very much.

Post Reply