Documentation on HHT integrator (parameter Gamma for ex) ?
Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 1:31 pm
- Location: University of British Columbia, Vancouver Canada
Documentation on HHT integrator (parameter Gamma for ex) ?
Hi,
I would like to use the HHT integrator for dynamic analysis.
However, no decent information is available in the user manual : in particular, for the main parameter Gamma, the only information is "Newmark parameter ?" (with the question mark...) (and normally the HHT method is also called Alpha-method)
I need to know what this Gamma parameter stands for and how it is used in this equations formulation, as well as what is the HHT formulation used in the code, and how to use this Gamma to specify the numerical damping associated with the method.
Thanks a lot for your help,
I would like to use the HHT integrator for dynamic analysis.
However, no decent information is available in the user manual : in particular, for the main parameter Gamma, the only information is "Newmark parameter ?" (with the question mark...) (and normally the HHT method is also called Alpha-method)
I need to know what this Gamma parameter stands for and how it is used in this equations formulation, as well as what is the HHT formulation used in the code, and how to use this Gamma to specify the numerical damping associated with the method.
Thanks a lot for your help,
Arnaud Charlet
University of British Columbia, Vancouver Canada
University of British Columbia, Vancouver Canada
For HHT you have to put a alpha value, not a gamma.
Originally alpha method is unconditionally accuracy and of second order accuracy with alpha (-0.3~0), but in OpenSees we put alpha (0.7~1).
So in opensees alpha=1 is equivalent to the newmark average acceleration method, and alpha=0.7 is maximum numerical dissipation without loosing the second order accuracy.
This is what I heard from Andreas Schellenberg.
Originally alpha method is unconditionally accuracy and of second order accuracy with alpha (-0.3~0), but in OpenSees we put alpha (0.7~1).
So in opensees alpha=1 is equivalent to the newmark average acceleration method, and alpha=0.7 is maximum numerical dissipation without loosing the second order accuracy.
This is what I heard from Andreas Schellenberg.
Seokho Jeong
Geosystems
Georgia Institute of Technology
Geosystems
Georgia Institute of Technology