problem with Nonlinear model of steel beam in opensees based on Deterioration modeling of steel components

Forum for OpenSees users to post questions, comments, etc. on the use of the OpenSees interpreter, OpenSees.exe

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
eftekhar
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2021 6:08 am

problem with Nonlinear model of steel beam in opensees based on Deterioration modeling of steel components

Post by eftekhar » Sat Dec 17, 2022 3:03 am

In his name is the judge
Hi

I think the best way to assign the nonlinear effect of steel components like beams that to model it with a plastic hinge.
So To build a nonlinear model of a one-story steel structure I use the Modified Ibarra – Krawinkler model to model my beam. In fact, I model a beam with two hing (zero length element) at the start and end and one elastic beam in the middle.

I used material developed by Lignos and Krawinkler named uniaxial material Bilin and here is more information about this material

https://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/inde ... n_Material

After all, when I extract the output belonging to the stress-strain of this material under seismic loading like Kobe I get something like this diagram. (kobe0.5g) based on

"Ibarra L.F., and Krawinkler, H. (2005). “Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations”, Rep. No. TB 152, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA."
named article and this diagram (ref1) the stress-strain shows the right modeling and performance. consider that my record is near fault and the diagram of reference also belongs to near-fault loading.

If I use the 1g scale for the Kobe record I get this diagram (kobe1g) and here is the diagram of the 2g scale for the Kobe record (kobe2g) So my best shot is this when the record multiply and the ground accel become higher the material reaches the capacity of its deterioration very more quickly(In fact after a short time the strain of material switch between 1e10 an-1e10 and strain is between about -2 and 2) but it's a little non-sens for me in the other hand there is one benchmark( in the reference is named it before this benchmark is for standard loading) diagram for this material stress-strain (logos) and my diagram is different with it.

In the end here are the 1M$ questions

1- why when I give more scale to record the diagram become like that?
2- and why my diagram is different from the benchmark stress-stress of material?
3- hinge shows nonlinear behavior when the center of mass of the plane gives about 1.5m displacements, is this ok?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Take refuge in the right.

here are the links to the photos

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Z4uGTZ ... share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T_5BAS ... share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hKCdX1 ... share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/10kdfRH ... share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/14fWXkr ... share_link

Post Reply