No of cycles in displacement graph higher in dynamic analysis then the experiment

Forum for OpenSees users to post questions, comments, etc. on the use of the OpenSees interpreter, OpenSees.exe

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
Prafullamalla
Posts: 160
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2015 6:32 pm

No of cycles in displacement graph higher in dynamic analysis then the experiment

Post by Prafullamalla » Sat Jan 18, 2020 5:28 am

I am doing a dynamic analysis of building with bolted connection and comparing a result with the shake table test. The frequency of model matches with the experiment result and is 4Hz. but in the acceleration and displacement graph of model , no of cycles of acceleration and displacement equals to the frequency of the building, whereas in the experiment no of cycles of acceleration and displacement is 1 or 2. what might be the reason?

https://onedrive.live.com/?cid=64E85C63 ... ot&o=OneUp
Prafulla Malla, Nepal
Praf_malla@hotmail.com

Prafullamalla
Posts: 160
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2015 6:32 pm

Re: No of cycles in displacement graph higher in dynamic analysis then the experiment

Post by Prafullamalla » Sat Jan 18, 2020 11:25 pm

Ok, the damping coefficient affects it. with increaing alpha for initial mode i.e., mass proportional, no . of frequency for displacement can be decreased but now, the amplitude is increasing
Prafulla Malla, Nepal
Praf_malla@hotmail.com

Prafullamalla
Posts: 160
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2015 6:32 pm

Re: No of cycles in displacement graph higher in dynamic analysis then the experiment

Post by Prafullamalla » Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:49 am

Because of Damping, now my curve matches with the experimental result but still I could not understand, why the experimental result is not similar to the model result. Check the fig. i.e., exp curve is smooth but my model has ups and down curve matching the fundamental frequency of building
Fig is in link below
https://onedrive.live.com/?cid=64E85C63 ... ot&o=OneUp
Prafulla Malla, Nepal
Praf_malla@hotmail.com

Post Reply