Question about modal analysis of the talll building

Forum for OpenSees users to post questions, comments, etc. on the use of the OpenSees interpreter, OpenSees.exe

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
gooddaytogo
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2019 7:15 pm
Location: Texas Tech University

Question about modal analysis of the talll building

Post by gooddaytogo » Fri May 31, 2019 8:43 am

Hello everyone:

I am trying to build a model of a tall frame building to carry out the mosal analysis, and I use the command below to define the mass density of the beam:

element nonlinearBeamColumn 1 1 2 7 1 1 -mass 0.86;

The ''-mass 0.86'' includes the Self Weight of the beam, Slab Dead Loads and Superposed Dead Loads.

My question is during the modal analysis process, you need to apply the Dead Loads and Live Loads to the building, how does the OpenSEES deal with the mass density ''-mass 0.86'' ? Does it ccalculate the Dead Loads from "element nonlinearBeamColumn 1 1 2 7 1 1 -mass 0.86;" automatically or should I apply the Dead Loads again when I apply the loads?

Thanks.
Last edited by gooddaytogo on Sat Aug 03, 2019 12:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

selimgunay
Posts: 913
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2013 8:50 pm
Location: University of California, Berkeley

Re: Question about modal analysis of the talll building

Post by selimgunay » Wed Jun 12, 2019 12:00 am

In Opensees, there is no relation between the vertical forces that you apply to the structure in gravity analysis and the masses that are used for the eigenvalue analysis. You should explicitly input all the necessary masses

gooddaytogo
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2019 7:15 pm
Location: Texas Tech University

Re: Question about modal analysis of the talll building

Post by gooddaytogo » Thu Jun 20, 2019 2:35 pm

So can I interpret it in this way that the ''-mass 0.86'' in the command, element nonlinearBeamColumn 1 1 2 7 1 1 -mass 0.86, will only be used in the modal analysis (eigenvalue analysis), and when you want to apply the dead load to the model using load pattern command, even ''-mass 0.86'' includes the dead load, it will not affect the dead load you applied to the building, so they are two independent process? Thanks.

selimgunay
Posts: 913
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2013 8:50 pm
Location: University of California, Berkeley

Re: Question about modal analysis of the talll building

Post by selimgunay » Fri Jun 21, 2019 2:08 pm

Yes they are two independent processes. "-mass 0.86" is not used in gravity analysis.

gooddaytogo
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2019 7:15 pm
Location: Texas Tech University

Re: Question about modal analysis of the talll building

Post by gooddaytogo » Tue Jun 23, 2020 3:51 pm

What if I do the static analysis and transient analysis? Will ''-mass 0.86'' be regarded as the dead load or should I define the dead load again by using load pattern command.

Also if I didn't turn the PDelta effect and didn't define the dead load by using load pattern command when doing the transient analysis, will the results be different? Thanks.

Post Reply