defining moment rotation relation for members

Forum for OpenSees users to post questions, comments, etc. on the use of the OpenSees interpreter, OpenSees.exe

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
UMUT AKIN
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:19 am
Location: Middle East Tech. University

defining moment rotation relation for members

Post by UMUT AKIN » Thu Feb 10, 2011 11:59 am

Hello,

Is there anyway to define the moment-rotation relationship for beams and columns. I tried placing 2D rotational springs at the connection points of beams and columns with the joint and assigning the hysteretic material but the damage coefficients complicates the definition and the result is not satisfactory.

Is there any other way to define the moment rotation relationship of a spring ?

felipe_cordero
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:05 pm
Location: Universidad de Chile

Re: defining moment rotation relation for members

Post by felipe_cordero » Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:56 pm

Hello,

Defining the moment-rotation relationship for beams and columns is possible. Look at this:

http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index ... Aggregator

UMUT AKIN
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:19 am
Location: Middle East Tech. University

Re: defining moment rotation relation for members

Post by UMUT AKIN » Tue Feb 15, 2011 4:55 am

thank you felipe. i will go through it.

UMUT AKIN
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:19 am
Location: Middle East Tech. University

Re: defining moment rotation relation for members

Post by UMUT AKIN » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:14 pm

I studied the manual and want to ask a question, the relation to be defined in section is Moment-Curvature, not Moment-Rotation, isn't it? (I am trying to add Mz relation to my section)

vesna
Posts: 3033
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 11:23 am
Location: UC Berkeley

Re: defining moment rotation relation for members

Post by vesna » Fri Feb 18, 2011 9:34 am

You can define your spring using either moment-rotation of moment-curvature relationship:

If you want to use moment-curvature relationship here is a simple example:

set Mp 103.0474
set EI 71963.55; #sectionsl stiffness
set b 0.01
set matTag 1
set secTag 1
set eleTag 1
uniaxialMaterial Steel02 $matTag $Mp $EI $b 20 0.925 0.15
section Aggregator $secTag $matTag Mz;
element zeroLengthSection $eleTag $nodeR $nodeC $secTag

If you want to use moment-rotation here is a simple example:

set phi_y 0.01; # rotation at yielding
set Mp_phi_y [expr Mp/phi_y]
uniaxialMaterial Steel02 $matTag $Mp $Mp_phi_y $b 20 0.925 0.15
element zeroLength $eleTag $nodeR $nodeC -mat $matTag -dir 6

Make sure to constrain $nodeR and $nodeC usein equalDOF command:
equalDOF $rNodeTag $cNodeTag 1 2

UMUT AKIN
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:19 am
Location: Middle East Tech. University

Re: defining moment rotation relation for members

Post by UMUT AKIN » Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:06 pm

thank you for the reply and the examples Vesna.

I want to define using Hysteretic material, to be able to control the total rotation mechanism of the beams and columns.
I assign the predefined Hysteretic material to hinge sections of Beamwithhinges element. Does this change the situation since if I define moment-rotation (moment-curvature*hinge length) the results semms to be out of order.

vesna
Posts: 3033
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 11:23 am
Location: UC Berkeley

Re: defining moment rotation relation for members

Post by vesna » Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:20 pm

When defining a section you need to define your material to represent moment-curvature relationship. If you are using zeroLenght element to define rotational spring, then you can define your material to represent moment-rotation relationship.

UMUT AKIN
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:19 am
Location: Middle East Tech. University

Re: defining moment rotation relation for members

Post by UMUT AKIN » Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:27 pm

I understand. Thank you very much for your help and also for the fast reply.

Best regards...

Post Reply