selimgunay wrote:
> You need to use the reaction recorder. Please see the below link for the
> syntax
>
> recorder Node -file nodesD.out -time -node 1 2 3 4 -dof 1 2 recorder
>
> http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index ... e_Recorder
hi
this recorder am using already. I want the result on the opensees screen by using print command.
By using I get coordinates and everything. But how can i get only reaction?
Search found 52 matches
- Tue Jan 23, 2018 10:22 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: how can I know the load vector?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1841
- Sat Jan 20, 2018 9:26 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: How to visualize your model
- Replies: 10
- Views: 8937
Re: How to visualize your model
gabrielvaldes wrote:
> zak and selim
> i have downloaded opensees navigator, now i can visualize my models
>
> thanks all of you for supporting me
> we will continue to make this community bigger
HI,
How to input the tcl code into Opensees Navigator and get the visualization?
> zak and selim
> i have downloaded opensees navigator, now i can visualize my models
>
> thanks all of you for supporting me
> we will continue to make this community bigger
HI,
How to input the tcl code into Opensees Navigator and get the visualization?
- Sat Jan 20, 2018 9:22 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: how can I know the load vector?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1841
Re: how can I know the load vector?
hi
How can I print only reaction of particular node with particular dof?
Say for example, I need to print node 11 only horizontal reaction and then the obtained horizontal reaction I need to multiply with some factor.
Can you please provide some solution for it?
Thanks in advance
How can I print only reaction of particular node with particular dof?
Say for example, I need to print node 11 only horizontal reaction and then the obtained horizontal reaction I need to multiply with some factor.
Can you please provide some solution for it?
Thanks in advance
- Mon Jan 15, 2018 10:58 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Shear hinge modelling using LimitState model
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1044
Re: Shear hinge modelling using LimitState model
Hi
Can you provide any example how to provide both shear hinge and forceBeamColumn element and integrate them with section integrator?
It will be easy for me to understand by going through the example
Thank you
Can you provide any example how to provide both shear hinge and forceBeamColumn element and integrate them with section integrator?
It will be easy for me to understand by going through the example
Thank you
- Fri Jan 12, 2018 3:17 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Shear hinge modelling using LimitState model
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1044
Re: Shear hinge modelling using LimitState model
Hi
Did you find how to model shear hinge ?
Can you explain how it is done?
Did you find how to model shear hinge ?
Can you explain how it is done?
- Mon Nov 13, 2017 3:02 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Hinges Location in Pushover Analysis
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1760
Re: Hinges Location in Pushover Analysis
EricsonEncinaZ wrote:
> For elements with distributed plasticity, i.e. either force-based
> (http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index ... mn_Element)
> or displacement-based
> (http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index ... mn_Element)
> elements, you have to define the number of integration points (sections) as
> part of the definition of the element. This integrations point will be the
> sample point where the element will sample the demands to workout the
> element output (according to what I understand) . So if you want to see if
> a section is developing plastic strains then you have to record the
> response of that section, as in the example shown at the bottom here
> http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index ... t_Recorder.
Hi EricsonEncinaZ, Thanks for your reply. Am working on RC frame.
How many BC elements to be used for forceBC element and dispBC element? I had seen somenone writing 1 forceBC element is enough, where 4 to 5 dispBC elements are required to analyse a structure. But is that 1 forceBC element same of both beam and column elements? or is it different?
I had read that the file in Opensees wiki FBE VS DBE. From that I had got the information.
Can you please explain these lines which is given in that file:
"The force-based approach relies on the availability of an exact
equilibrium solution within the basic system of a beam-column
element. Equilibrium between element and section forces is exact,
which holds in the range of constitutive nonlinearity.
• Section forces are determined from the basic forces by interpolation
within the basic system.
- Interpolation comes from static equilibrium and provides constant
axial force and linear distribution of bending moment in the
absence of distributed element loads."
Thanks in advance
> For elements with distributed plasticity, i.e. either force-based
> (http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index ... mn_Element)
> or displacement-based
> (http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index ... mn_Element)
> elements, you have to define the number of integration points (sections) as
> part of the definition of the element. This integrations point will be the
> sample point where the element will sample the demands to workout the
> element output (according to what I understand) . So if you want to see if
> a section is developing plastic strains then you have to record the
> response of that section, as in the example shown at the bottom here
> http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index ... t_Recorder.
Hi EricsonEncinaZ, Thanks for your reply. Am working on RC frame.
How many BC elements to be used for forceBC element and dispBC element? I had seen somenone writing 1 forceBC element is enough, where 4 to 5 dispBC elements are required to analyse a structure. But is that 1 forceBC element same of both beam and column elements? or is it different?
I had read that the file in Opensees wiki FBE VS DBE. From that I had got the information.
Can you please explain these lines which is given in that file:
"The force-based approach relies on the availability of an exact
equilibrium solution within the basic system of a beam-column
element. Equilibrium between element and section forces is exact,
which holds in the range of constitutive nonlinearity.
• Section forces are determined from the basic forces by interpolation
within the basic system.
- Interpolation comes from static equilibrium and provides constant
axial force and linear distribution of bending moment in the
absence of distributed element loads."
Thanks in advance
- Fri Nov 10, 2017 10:16 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Hinges Location in Pushover Analysis
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1760
Re: Hinges Location in Pushover Analysis
Hi EricsonEncinaZ,
Thanks for your reply.
I didn't get what you mean by read the integration points? Can you please explain a little bit further. Am new to opensees
Thanks in advance
Thanks for your reply.
I didn't get what you mean by read the integration points? Can you please explain a little bit further. Am new to opensees
Thanks in advance
- Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:47 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Hinges Location in Pushover Analysis
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1760
Hinges Location in Pushover Analysis
Hi,
How to know the hinges location in Opensees while performing Pushover Analysis step by step?
In SAP2000, we get to know by color, since visualization is not possible in Opensees, is there any command for it to know the location point?
How to know the hinges location in Opensees while performing Pushover Analysis step by step?
In SAP2000, we get to know by color, since visualization is not possible in Opensees, is there any command for it to know the location point?
- Thu Oct 26, 2017 3:07 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: PDelta analysis for Pushover analysis ERROR
- Replies: 0
- Views: 704
PDelta analysis for Pushover analysis ERROR
Hi,
I am performing pushover analysis for 2D RC frame.
1)Iam using for transformation command for defining elements as " geomTransf ColTransfType PDelta". Is it necessary to define the rest <-jntOffset $dXi $dYi $dXj $dYj> always?
2)When am using PDelta, am getting initial displacement values as negative values. Is it correct? If correct, how to make a graph with positive values by taking those negative displacement values and corresponding Base Shear values in the final plot?
Am showing an example of initial part of the results below:
Disp Base Shear
0.0062 0.0000
0.0130 0.0000
0.0144 0.0000
-0.0019 0.0000
-0.0534 0.0000
-0.1554 0.0000
-0.3134 0.0000
-0.4966 0.0000
-0.7037 0.0000
-1.1284 0.0000
-0.8284 1.3089
-0.5284 2.6195
-0.2284 3.9186
0.0716 5.2092
0.3716 6.4849
so here, the displacement value -0.2284 can I make it to zero, can I add the corresponding base shear value 3.9186 to the other base shear values and take it as final?
3) Is it necessary to do " geomTransf ColTransfType PDelta" for pushover analysis, or is it sufficient to do Linear ?
Thanks in advance
I am performing pushover analysis for 2D RC frame.
1)Iam using for transformation command for defining elements as " geomTransf ColTransfType PDelta". Is it necessary to define the rest <-jntOffset $dXi $dYi $dXj $dYj> always?
2)When am using PDelta, am getting initial displacement values as negative values. Is it correct? If correct, how to make a graph with positive values by taking those negative displacement values and corresponding Base Shear values in the final plot?
Am showing an example of initial part of the results below:
Disp Base Shear
0.0062 0.0000
0.0130 0.0000
0.0144 0.0000
-0.0019 0.0000
-0.0534 0.0000
-0.1554 0.0000
-0.3134 0.0000
-0.4966 0.0000
-0.7037 0.0000
-1.1284 0.0000
-0.8284 1.3089
-0.5284 2.6195
-0.2284 3.9186
0.0716 5.2092
0.3716 6.4849
so here, the displacement value -0.2284 can I make it to zero, can I add the corresponding base shear value 3.9186 to the other base shear values and take it as final?
3) Is it necessary to do " geomTransf ColTransfType PDelta" for pushover analysis, or is it sufficient to do Linear ?
Thanks in advance
- Mon Oct 23, 2017 5:14 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: ForceBeamColumn Vs DisplacementBeamColumn Element?
- Replies: 0
- Views: 512
ForceBeamColumn Vs DisplacementBeamColumn Element?
Hi,
How many dispBC to be used for matching with one forceBC element? I had the read the file FBE VS DBE and followed same, but am not getting results as such.
Also which element is better to use if one needs to compare with SAP2000 results?
Thanks in advance
How many dispBC to be used for matching with one forceBC element? I had the read the file FBE VS DBE and followed same, but am not getting results as such.
Also which element is better to use if one needs to compare with SAP2000 results?
Thanks in advance
- Mon Oct 23, 2017 4:48 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Does the number of nodes/elements affect the results?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 5419
Re: Does the number of nodes/elements affect the results?
EricsonEncinaZ wrote:
> If you are doing an elastic analysis it should not matter the number of
> nodes and elements, but if your analysis contains non-linearities (and
> depending on the type of elements and loads) meshing is quite important. If
> this is your case, this is the reason why you have different results. A
> meshing sensitivity analysis should be performed to determine the best
> meshing scheme that provides accurate results and it is not too
> computationally expensive.
HI,
How to perform meshing sensitivity analysis? And how to get the best meshing scheme?
CAn you help me with this
Thank you
> If you are doing an elastic analysis it should not matter the number of
> nodes and elements, but if your analysis contains non-linearities (and
> depending on the type of elements and loads) meshing is quite important. If
> this is your case, this is the reason why you have different results. A
> meshing sensitivity analysis should be performed to determine the best
> meshing scheme that provides accurate results and it is not too
> computationally expensive.
HI,
How to perform meshing sensitivity analysis? And how to get the best meshing scheme?
CAn you help me with this
Thank you
- Sat Oct 21, 2017 2:51 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Assigning different rebar detailing sections to a member
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5904
Re: Assigning different rebar detailing sections to a member
How is it possible with disp based elements?
- Sat Oct 21, 2017 2:44 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: how to get the same results with disp and force elements?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5805
Re: how to get the same results with disp and force elements
mohsenrock wrote:
> other parameters like integrator or ... should not be changed right?
Hi,
What is the use of integrator?
Are you able to resolve the issue with 4 beam elements?
In my case it didnt resolve the issue
> other parameters like integrator or ... should not be changed right?
Hi,
What is the use of integrator?
Are you able to resolve the issue with 4 beam elements?
In my case it didnt resolve the issue
- Sat Oct 21, 2017 2:35 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: error in pushover response in the case of plasticity.
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3353
Re: error in pushover response in the case of plasticity.
mohsenrock wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your answer. I used a concrete material with a minimum
> value for tensile strength and it works.
Hi
are you getting same results for the different cases you have mentioned.
I have used 5 dispBC elements for representing one beam and run the pushover analysis. and also using forceBC element I had run the model.
In these two cases am getting different results? Can you help me with this that which element to be used for better results?
And also which steel material to be used for RC frame for better output? Is it steel01 or steel02 or reinforcing steel? Currently am using Reinforcingsteel
Thanks in advance
> Thanks a lot for your answer. I used a concrete material with a minimum
> value for tensile strength and it works.
Hi
are you getting same results for the different cases you have mentioned.
I have used 5 dispBC elements for representing one beam and run the pushover analysis. and also using forceBC element I had run the model.
In these two cases am getting different results? Can you help me with this that which element to be used for better results?
And also which steel material to be used for RC frame for better output? Is it steel01 or steel02 or reinforcing steel? Currently am using Reinforcingsteel
Thanks in advance
- Sat Oct 21, 2017 2:28 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: A Question About nonlinearBeamColumn element
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6464
Re: A Question About nonlinearBeamColumn element
fmk wrote:
>
> http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index ... ed_Element
Hi,
I had read that file FBE VS DBE approach. I have modelled 2D single story RC frame using dispBC and forceBC elements for pushover analysis.
In fact I had subdivided each element into 5 elements for dispBC element, by that am getting Baseshear =52 KN and corresponding displacement as 57mm
and by using forceBC element am getting Baseshear= 41 KN and corresponding displacement as 36mm.
It is a huge variation in the results. Now am confused which element to be used for my further analysis.
I have to do pushover analysis for 3, 4 , 5 ,7 story RC frames, so I would like to know which element is preferred for Pushover analysis? and if dispBC is to be used how many divisions(meshing) to be done for getting better results?
Thanks in adavnce
>
> http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index ... ed_Element
Hi,
I had read that file FBE VS DBE approach. I have modelled 2D single story RC frame using dispBC and forceBC elements for pushover analysis.
In fact I had subdivided each element into 5 elements for dispBC element, by that am getting Baseshear =52 KN and corresponding displacement as 57mm
and by using forceBC element am getting Baseshear= 41 KN and corresponding displacement as 36mm.
It is a huge variation in the results. Now am confused which element to be used for my further analysis.
I have to do pushover analysis for 3, 4 , 5 ,7 story RC frames, so I would like to know which element is preferred for Pushover analysis? and if dispBC is to be used how many divisions(meshing) to be done for getting better results?
Thanks in adavnce