The OpenSees Community

Good drift. By installing the last release of matplotlib Uninstalling matplotlib-3.2.0: Successfully uninstalled matplotlib-3.2.0 Successfully installed matplotlib-3.4.2 pillow-8.3.0 the script works fine, as per next screenshot. Thanks Nevertheless, as said previously (where I left my email address...

Hi. I do confirm the bug . By shortly calling the code demo.py , my output is as follows: C:\Training>python demo.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "demo.py", line 69, in <module> opsv.plot_model() File "C:\Users\Alfabeta\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python38\lib\site-packages\openseespy\p...

Thanks so much, anuragiitg. Again something doesn't go properly, according to the following screenshot and the code s5.py below, derived from your drift. Prompt on opening post title: "one more good drift, but still failure" https://i.postimg.cc/65JvX6jT/03.png file s5.py # --- s5.py --- Jun.06. 202...

With warm pleasure, I do post the following comparison (screenshot) with other software, where openseespy fully comply.
Here no loads involve soil supports. Cheers

Despite the given instructions have been correctly applied (see next screenshot), errors still arise . New code .py is uploaded below. Thx&Cheers File "s3.py", line 65, in <module> opsdm.DiscretizeMember(1, 2, 10, 'forceBeamColumn', 5, 1, 1, 1) File "C:\Users\Alfabeta\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\P...

Yes, confirmed, openseespy 3.2.2.10 presents erroneous values on diagrams when external loads (forces,couples) are applied on supports nodes, that shortly means when lateral distributed loads (wind) act on the structure. Screenshot and new .py code below. I'll be careful to use the module in such ci...

Thanks for your drift. Nevertheless, some doubts arise on writing into a GitHub issue, are we sure that somebody replies? In addition, what I believe (up to now) is the presence of a bug due to element loaded with force and couple at the soil support (node #1) , while all flows properly in the other...

Reference is made to this screenshot coming from the python code written underneath https://i.postimg.cc/6QhG25Qb/moment-discrepancy.png The 'strange matter' can be seen trough next schedule. Looking at bending moment on soil support (1) the proper value should be 69.996 (also confirmed by other sow...

Around row 70 of s2.py code shown underneath, I summarized the parameters to be filled in (taken from the guide), but something went wrong, due to lack of experience. At end of the code is visible the error prompt . Please, could somebody be so kind to write the appropriate parameters inside the com...

I'll try. Thank you

Thank you!

As per this screenshot https://i.postimg.cc/s2PBsbk6/fault-displacemnts.png and next python code. Thanks in advance for help. # --- t13_forum.py --- May.31, 2021 ---- # portal with inclined peer # import openseespy.opensees as ops import openseespy.postprocessing.ops_vis as opsv import matplotlib.py...

Could someone tell my how to obtain values of displacements, in order to compare with the ones of first post? Here is the code I've used. Thanks in advance. Plotted displacements: https://i.postimg.cc/s2kqys4r/displacements.png # --- s.py --- May.29, 2021 ---- # simply supported beam with distribute...

Oh yes! Thank you, the test below, applied to your suggested code, gives fine results, being known that warning tags need to be deeply investigated. One more question, please. Which is the command for defining a load uniformly distributed on a beam ? Cheers EDIT: Just found the answer for distribute...

Hi all, Just new in this community, please be patient to read what I'm looking for. According to the last release of Openseespy manual, downloadable from here https://buildmedia.readthedocs.org/media/pdf/openseespydoc/latest/openseespydoc.pdf is quite difficult (for newcomers in this module, even be...