The element SFI_MVLEM_3D works perfectly when:
direction of ACC is 1
timeSeries Path 11 -dt $dt -filePath $filePath1 -factor $fac
pattern UniformExcitation 100 1 -accel 11 -fact 1
But crashed in the first step when:
direction of ACC is 2
timeSeries Path 110 -dt $dt -filePath $filePath2 -factor $fac
pattern UniformExcitation 200 2 -accel 110 -fact 1
Search found 28 matches
- Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:49 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: SFI_MVLEM_3D Not Working Ground Motion
- Replies: 0
- Views: 9168
- Wed Oct 25, 2023 11:15 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: forceBeamColumn section recorder does not work in the latest version
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3740
Re: forceBeamColumn section recorder does not work in the latest version
The problem resolved!
In the 3.5 version instead of "-section", "section" works in the recorder syntax.
Thanks by the way for your reply, Prof. Scott
In the 3.5 version instead of "-section", "section" works in the recorder syntax.
Thanks by the way for your reply, Prof. Scott
- Wed Oct 25, 2023 12:35 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: forceBeamColumn section recorder does not work in the latest version
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3740
forceBeamColumn section recorder does not work in the latest version
I use this syntax to record section force of a forceBeamColumn element in the 3.5 version:
recorder Element -file fileName.txt -ele 2032 -section 1 force
but it doesn't work. However the same syntax works perfectly fine when using 3.3 version!!!
recorder Element -file fileName.txt -ele 2032 -section 1 force
but it doesn't work. However the same syntax works perfectly fine when using 3.3 version!!!
- Thu Sep 29, 2022 6:34 am
- Forum: OpenSeesPy
- Topic: Cant import Openseespy on python3.10
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2696
Cant import Openseespy on python3.10
when I run the following line import openseespy.opensees as ops
I get:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ".../....py", line 8, in <module>
import openseespy.opensees as ops
File "C:\Users\Asus\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python310\lib\site-packages\openseespy\opensees\__init__.py", line 22, in <module>
raise RuntimeError('Failed to import openseespy on Windows.')
RuntimeError: Failed to import openseespy on Windows.
I get:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ".../....py", line 8, in <module>
import openseespy.opensees as ops
File "C:\Users\Asus\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python310\lib\site-packages\openseespy\opensees\__init__.py", line 22, in <module>
raise RuntimeError('Failed to import openseespy on Windows.')
RuntimeError: Failed to import openseespy on Windows.
- Tue Aug 31, 2021 12:23 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Multi Directional Cyclic Load Protocol
- Replies: 0
- Views: 11739
Multi Directional Cyclic Load Protocol
How is it possible to run a simulation with a cyclic load protocol working in both (x and y) directions?
the x direction loading is displacement based and the y -direction loading is force base protocols!
I know how to work with one of each using the opensees integrator, yet don't know how to do so when there is simultaneous loading on the specimen!
the x direction loading is displacement based and the y -direction loading is force base protocols!
I know how to work with one of each using the opensees integrator, yet don't know how to do so when there is simultaneous loading on the specimen!
- Thu May 23, 2019 4:27 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Problem with ModIMKPeakOriented and ModIMKPinching materials
- Replies: 10
- Views: 11357
Re: Problem with ModIMKPeakOriented and ModIMKPinching mater
Is the issue solved yet??
- Tue May 21, 2019 4:19 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Problem with ModIMKPeakOriented!
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2535
Problem with ModIMKPeakOriented!
I did a dynamic SDOF analysis using the ModIMKPeakOriented material and the results were quite different from what is happening! Bilin material with the same properties gives much more appropriate responses! Is there any bug with this ModIMKPeakOriented in the transient analysis? or it is me that has this issue?
- Tue May 21, 2019 4:09 am
- Forum: Parallel Processing
- Topic: OpenseesParallel3.0.3
- Replies: 5
- Views: 14222
Re: OpenseesParallel3.0.3
i'm having the same issue!
- Tue Jan 08, 2019 9:52 am
- Forum: Parallel Processing
- Topic: A problem on MPICH2 on windows 10
- Replies: 8
- Views: 15713
Re: A problem on MPICH2 on windows 10
I could not comprehend your problem. Is not there any output?
- Tue Jan 08, 2019 8:30 am
- Forum: Parallel Processing
- Topic: A problem on MPICH2 on windows 10
- Replies: 8
- Views: 15713
Re: A problem on MPICH2 on windows 10
I could resolve the problem by reinstall tcl tk file and making sure that it is installed via adminstrator
- Thu Jan 03, 2019 3:57 am
- Forum: Parallel Processing
- Topic: A problem on MPICH2 on windows 10
- Replies: 8
- Views: 15713
Re: A problem on MPICH2 on windows 10
what is the output when you input "smpd"?
- Wed Dec 12, 2018 9:45 am
- Forum: Parallel Processing
- Topic: Error using OpenSeesSP
- Replies: 8
- Views: 17373
Re: Error using OpenSeesSP
So, is not it possible to use shellmitc4 via openseesSP?
- Tue Dec 11, 2018 12:04 am
- Forum: Parallel Processing
- Topic: A problem on MPICH2 on windows 10
- Replies: 8
- Views: 15713
A problem on MPICH2 on windows 10
Hi
I am having one intimidating problem.
I have installed MPICH2 as all the references said and when I hit : mpiexec -validate it shows "SUCCESS", yet when i want to run the test file "mpiexec -n 4 cpi" it actually takes about to run the file which is weird. but after 1 min it works well. Then i tried to run an opensees file "mpiexec -np 4 openseesmp myfile.tcl" and it after 1-2 min it shows nothing and goes to the new command on the console!! (I even noticed that during this 1-2 min of running the mpiexec neither of my CPU or MEMORY is been used! and i looks like the "mpiexec" is not actually working during this 1-2 min)
What makes more desperate is that I have tried the same things on other LAPTOPS and every thing was ok (e.g. test file "mpiexec -n 4 cpi" was instatenous and even the opensees files works well)
this all happens while my hardwares are better than the other laptops!
I guess it is not a matter of opensees it is more basic, mpich is the problem because for even its simple example file it takes about 1 min to run it.
I have tried any could is possible. I have unistall a reinstall the mpich million times an the problem still remain the same!!!
I am having one intimidating problem.
I have installed MPICH2 as all the references said and when I hit : mpiexec -validate it shows "SUCCESS", yet when i want to run the test file "mpiexec -n 4 cpi" it actually takes about to run the file which is weird. but after 1 min it works well. Then i tried to run an opensees file "mpiexec -np 4 openseesmp myfile.tcl" and it after 1-2 min it shows nothing and goes to the new command on the console!! (I even noticed that during this 1-2 min of running the mpiexec neither of my CPU or MEMORY is been used! and i looks like the "mpiexec" is not actually working during this 1-2 min)
What makes more desperate is that I have tried the same things on other LAPTOPS and every thing was ok (e.g. test file "mpiexec -n 4 cpi" was instatenous and even the opensees files works well)
this all happens while my hardwares are better than the other laptops!
I guess it is not a matter of opensees it is more basic, mpich is the problem because for even its simple example file it takes about 1 min to run it.
I have tried any could is possible. I have unistall a reinstall the mpich million times an the problem still remain the same!!!
- Mon Oct 29, 2018 12:42 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Apply Multi-Shock
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1467
Apply Multi-Shock
Is it possible to apply two different Aftershocks to a Main shock induced structure in opensees????
I mean the main shock is applied once and without repeating the main shock analysis, analyze the structure under 2 different aftershocks!
or I just have to repeat the main shock- after shock two times
I mean the main shock is applied once and without repeating the main shock analysis, analyze the structure under 2 different aftershocks!
or I just have to repeat the main shock- after shock two times
- Wed Sep 26, 2018 12:42 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Truss Recorder
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2702
Re: Truss Recorder
EricsonEncinaZ wrote:
> It should be strain at the mid-section. If you change "-file" by
> "-xml", you will be able to see headers in the txt files showing
> what each column of the output file is.
thanks,sir
> It should be strain at the mid-section. If you change "-file" by
> "-xml", you will be able to see headers in the txt files showing
> what each column of the output file is.
thanks,sir