I am using OpenseesSP to push a huge 3D model to a certain point.
When I change the number of cores or I run it in different computer, it affects the point which the model is diverging.
I wanted to know what is happening and how I can improve the convergence?
It should be noted that results are identical just the point which is not converging changes.
Search found 23 matches
- Sat May 27, 2017 5:53 pm
- Forum: Parallel Processing
- Topic: different numbers of cores affect the convergence
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4446
- Thu Mar 09, 2017 3:40 pm
- Forum: Parallel Processing
- Topic: system Mumps in OpenSeesSP and push over
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9252
Re: system Mumps in OpenSeesSP and push over
Hi Frank,
Thanks for your response.
I used -ICNTL 90. I got this error:
Work array too small; use -ICNTL14 option, the default is -ICNTL 20 make 20 larger.
The memory you are talking about is RAM in computer?
Should I enhance the RAM or I should use better CPU.
My CPU has 8 cores and I am using 7 cores to run the model. I kept one of them for windows to work on it.
What is your recommendation?
Thanks
Thanks for your response.
I used -ICNTL 90. I got this error:
Work array too small; use -ICNTL14 option, the default is -ICNTL 20 make 20 larger.
The memory you are talking about is RAM in computer?
Should I enhance the RAM or I should use better CPU.
My CPU has 8 cores and I am using 7 cores to run the model. I kept one of them for windows to work on it.
What is your recommendation?
Thanks
- Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:02 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: continuing a finished analysis
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3412
Re: continuing a finished analysis
Can you please explain how we can do it?
Thanks
Thanks
- Thu Mar 02, 2017 10:38 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: continuing a finished analysis
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3412
continuing a finished analysis
I was wondering is it possible to continue an analysis which is failed or finished?
For instance, If one pushes building to 1%, is it possible to push it further to 1.5% after the previous analysis is done and saved.
Or we should redo from zero?
For instance, If one pushes building to 1%, is it possible to push it further to 1.5% after the previous analysis is done and saved.
Or we should redo from zero?
- Thu Mar 02, 2017 6:39 pm
- Forum: Parallel Processing
- Topic: system Mumps in OpenSeesSP and push over
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9252
Re: system Mumps in OpenSeesSP and push over
Thanks.
It is ok now.
Can you please explain the "system Mumps -ICNTL14 80"? what is 80 means? I did not find it in wiki.
It is ok now.
Can you please explain the "system Mumps -ICNTL14 80"? what is 80 means? I did not find it in wiki.
- Thu Mar 02, 2017 6:36 pm
- Forum: Parallel Processing
- Topic: limitation on the number of recorders
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8711
Re: limitation on the number of recorders
Hi,
Thanks for your response.
When I record the nodes in separate files ( each node in separate node command) opensees freezes. Without progressing in the analysis, it starts writing in the results folder and if I do not stop it, the volume of this folder can reach to 10 GB.
But I found the solution. I should write all of the node tags in one command of recorder. Then it is fine.
Thanks for your response.
When I record the nodes in separate files ( each node in separate node command) opensees freezes. Without progressing in the analysis, it starts writing in the results folder and if I do not stop it, the volume of this folder can reach to 10 GB.
But I found the solution. I should write all of the node tags in one command of recorder. Then it is fine.
- Tue Feb 28, 2017 11:11 pm
- Forum: Parallel Processing
- Topic: limitation on the number of recorders
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8711
Re: limitation on the number of recorders
Hi,
Thanks for your response.
I am modelling a 12 storey building in 3D. The beam/column elements are elastic elements with concentrated hinges using zero length elements and shear walls are modelled using displacement beam column elements.
I wanted to record each node rotations. When I use the recorder commands for one node it works. But when it comes to recording all of the nodes, it has some errors.
Thanks for your response.
I am modelling a 12 storey building in 3D. The beam/column elements are elastic elements with concentrated hinges using zero length elements and shear walls are modelled using displacement beam column elements.
I wanted to record each node rotations. When I use the recorder commands for one node it works. But when it comes to recording all of the nodes, it has some errors.
- Tue Feb 28, 2017 11:06 pm
- Forum: Parallel Processing
- Topic: system Mumps in OpenSeesSP and push over
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9252
Re: system Mumps in OpenSeesSP and push over
Hi Frank,
Thanks for your response.
First I perform gravity analysis with these scripts:
constraints Penalty 1.e25 1.e25
numberer RCM;
system Mumps;
test NormDispIncr 1.0e-6 20;
algorithm KrylovNewton ;
integrator LoadControl 0.1;
analysis Static;
analyze 10;
Then I carry out push over analysis with this code:
constraints Transformation;
numberer RCM;
system Mumps;
algorithm KrylovNewton ;
integrator DisplacementControl $IDctrlNode $IDctrlDOF $Dincr ;
analysis Static ;
In general, I am modelling a 12 storey building in 3D. The beam/column elements are elastic elements with concentrated hinges using zero length elements and shear walls are modelled using displacement beam column elements.
Because the code is too long, I cannot send it here. But, I can email you if it helps.
Also, I have another question, I saw somewhere you where suggesting to use:
system Mumps -ICNTL14 80;
What is it exactly, what does each number means?
Kind Regards,
Alireza
Thanks for your response.
First I perform gravity analysis with these scripts:
constraints Penalty 1.e25 1.e25
numberer RCM;
system Mumps;
test NormDispIncr 1.0e-6 20;
algorithm KrylovNewton ;
integrator LoadControl 0.1;
analysis Static;
analyze 10;
Then I carry out push over analysis with this code:
constraints Transformation;
numberer RCM;
system Mumps;
algorithm KrylovNewton ;
integrator DisplacementControl $IDctrlNode $IDctrlDOF $Dincr ;
analysis Static ;
In general, I am modelling a 12 storey building in 3D. The beam/column elements are elastic elements with concentrated hinges using zero length elements and shear walls are modelled using displacement beam column elements.
Because the code is too long, I cannot send it here. But, I can email you if it helps.
Also, I have another question, I saw somewhere you where suggesting to use:
system Mumps -ICNTL14 80;
What is it exactly, what does each number means?
Kind Regards,
Alireza
- Tue Feb 28, 2017 1:41 am
- Forum: Parallel Processing
- Topic: system Mumps in OpenSeesSP and push over
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9252
system Mumps in OpenSeesSP and push over
I am doing gravity analysis and push over analysis in succession using OpenSeesSP.
When I use system Mumps in OpenSeesSP just for the gravity analysis it works. But it does not work for the push over analysis after performing gravity analysis.
What is the problem?
When I use system Mumps in OpenSeesSP just for the gravity analysis it works. But it does not work for the push over analysis after performing gravity analysis.
What is the problem?
- Tue Feb 28, 2017 1:36 am
- Forum: Parallel Processing
- Topic: limitation on the number of recorders
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8711
limitation on the number of recorders
Is there any limitation on the numbers of recorders using OpenSeesSP?
The recorders work individually but not together!
The recorders work individually but not together!
- Wed Oct 12, 2016 4:11 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: SFI MVLEM in 3D
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3915
Re: SFI MVLEM in 3D
Dear fmk,
Thanks for your response.
Can you please explain it more?
Because when I use nodes with 3 coordinates, I see this "MVLEM:: setDomain,.: 2 coords required at nodes, not enough provided for element"
It seems that when I use nodes with 3 coordinates, it does not recognize. I was wondering that can you please explain how I can use nodes in 3D environment with 2 coordinates?
Thanks and Kind Regards
Thanks for your response.
Can you please explain it more?
Because when I use nodes with 3 coordinates, I see this "MVLEM:: setDomain,.: 2 coords required at nodes, not enough provided for element"
It seems that when I use nodes with 3 coordinates, it does not recognize. I was wondering that can you please explain how I can use nodes in 3D environment with 2 coordinates?
Thanks and Kind Regards
- Tue Oct 11, 2016 10:34 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: SFI MVLEM in 3D
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3915
SFI MVLEM in 3D
I was wondering to know that whether "SFI MVLEM - Cyclic Shear-Flexure Interaction Model for RC Walls " element is working in 3D environment or not.
- Mon Jul 25, 2016 12:24 am
- Forum: Useful Scripts.
- Topic: LimitStateMaterial
- Replies: 6
- Views: 14400
Re: LimitStateMaterial
Hi Jayanthan,
I could not get rational results from this element. But about the definition of the inputs, you can look this manual:
http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/image ... Manual.pdf
Kind Regards,
Alireza
I could not get rational results from this element. But about the definition of the inputs, you can look this manual:
http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/image ... Manual.pdf
Kind Regards,
Alireza
- Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:48 pm
- Forum: Useful Scripts.
- Topic: LimitStateMaterial
- Replies: 6
- Views: 14400
Re: LimitStateMaterial
I found the reason why the material was not running.
It was because the optional part (<$ndI $ndJ $dof $perpDirn $delta>) in the command is not optional:
limitCurve Shear $curveTag $eleTag $rho $fc $b $h $d $Fsw $Kdeg $Fres $defType $forType <$ndI $ndJ $dof $perpDirn $delta>
It should be written, then it runs.
I have another question regarding this material. Is it possible to use SI units or the input should be in inch and Psi?
Thanks
It was because the optional part (<$ndI $ndJ $dof $perpDirn $delta>) in the command is not optional:
limitCurve Shear $curveTag $eleTag $rho $fc $b $h $d $Fsw $Kdeg $Fres $defType $forType <$ndI $ndJ $dof $perpDirn $delta>
It should be written, then it runs.
I have another question regarding this material. Is it possible to use SI units or the input should be in inch and Psi?
Thanks
- Mon Feb 22, 2016 4:56 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: a multi-linear curve material
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3200
Re: a multi-linear curve material
Thanks for your response.
I wanted to use Hysteretic Material for this purpose but apparently this material is not working in this version of opensees.
Do you have other suggestions for the alternative material?
If not can you please introduce some references for coding a new material?
Thanks a lot.
I wanted to use Hysteretic Material for this purpose but apparently this material is not working in this version of opensees.
Do you have other suggestions for the alternative material?
If not can you please introduce some references for coding a new material?
Thanks a lot.