Integration for Force-Based Beam-Column Elements

Forum for OpenSees users to post questions, comments, etc. on the use of the OpenSees interpreter, OpenSees.exe

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
edwardal
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2016 5:33 am
Location: Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori (IUSS)

Integration for Force-Based Beam-Column Elements

Post by edwardal » Thu Mar 16, 2017 1:52 pm

I'm not sure if this is the right board to post this question to, but anyway... I'm having trouble understanding what exactly the integration weights represent in Force-Based Beam-Column Elements. If I use

"Lobatto $secTag $numIntgrPts"

with numIntgrPts = 3, the following locations and weights are assigned to each section (from the source code)

Location:
xi[0] = -1.0;
xi[1] = 0.0;
xi[2] = 1.0;

Weight:
wt[0] = 0.333333333333333;
wt[1] = 1.333333333333333;
wt[2] = 0.333333333333333;

My understanding from a mathematical point of view is that some function will be evaluated at each location and then the evaluation will be weighted by the corresponding wt value. The weighted values are then added to evaluate the integral.

From an engineering point of view, I have a couple questions:
1) What are the integrals being evaluated over the element?
2) Is the weight indicative of the length of the member that the section is "representing"? For example, consider a member that is 6m long with numIntgrPts=3. Would the end sections "represent" the end 1m on each side (1m = 0.333 * 6m / 2) and the center section the remaining 4m (4m = 1.333 * 6m / 2) of the element?

Any insight would be appreciated.

fmk
Site Admin
Posts: 5883
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: UC Berkeley
Contact:

Re: Integration for Force-Based Beam-Column Elements

Post by fmk » Fri Mar 17, 2017 5:29 am

you should look at the following paper:
http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28A ... 2%28244%29

Post Reply